5 large recordings made in the Manchester test: The Indian Cricket team managed to attract the fourth test game against England in Manchester on Sunday. England had taken a huge advance of 311 points by scoring 669 points in the first round. In response, Team India managed to win the head with the help of centuries by Kl Rahul-Shubman Gill then Ravira Jadeja-Washington Sundar, because of which England had no chance of winning the match. For the Indian team, the drawing of the match is no less than a victory.
The Indian team was almost looking to lose this match by a round. But when morale is high, no team can overcome you. The Indian team has also proven this thing. Many big records were made in this exciting match. In this article, we will tell you about 5 major recordings.
5. Record of most centuries in a series of tests
The drummers of the Indian team marked 11 centuries in this series. With this, the men in blue jointly became the first team to mark 11 centuries in a series. The Antilles drummers had obtained this feat in a series of home tests in 1978.
4. Ben Stokes equaled Ian Botham
Ben Stokes received the match player prize for his brilliant versatile performance. Stokes has now become the second joint player in England to win the greatest player in the test match. Stokes has now become Potm 12 times in the tests. With that, he equaled Ian Botham. Now, only Joe Root (13 times) is ahead of Stokes.
3. The record of a captain who wins the draw and chooses to play Old Trafford without winning a match remains intact
The sequence of a captain who won the draw and chooses to play Old Trafford in Manchester without winning a match continues. In 12 games, the captain made Bowl’s decision after winning the draw. Among these, 9 games were traced and 3 times, the victorious captain had to face the defeat.
2. Third time when a team scored 400 points more after losing two counters at 0
In the Manchester test, the Indian team lost its first two counters on a score of 0. However, despite this, Team India managed to score more than 400 points. It was only the third time in the history of test cricket that a team has accomplished such a feat. Team India (451 / 8D vs Antilles) is at the first position of this list. At the same time, the Antilles (443 / 7D VS Team Indian Team) are in second position.
1. team marking 350 Plus man manages the most times – India
Until now, four games have been played in the Anderson-Tendulkar trophy and the Indian Cricket team has managed to score more than 350 points 7 times. This is a record. Earlier, Australia held the record to score more than 350 points in a series of tests most in number. Australia achieved this feat in three series (1920, 1948, 1989 against England).
Read also: Ind VS Eng 5th Test: Will Jasprit Bumrah play the oval test?
Interesting findings but Im curious about the specific parameters used. What was the sampling frequency? Where these continuous recordings or segmented? The storage format would also effect the file size significantly – were they compressed or raw data? These details matter alot when evaluating the validity of the test results.
I dont get it, what exactly is the point of these recordings?? Seems like a waste of resources to me. Could of spent the time and money on something more usefull.
Oh yeah, because FIVE whole recordings is definitely groundbreaking research. I’m sure the scientific community is just waiting with bated breath for this revolutionary contribution to human knowledge. 🙄
Amazing work!! The detail in these recordings must be incredible if there that large.
I have to disagree with the methodology described here. Five recordings is hardly a sufficient sample size for any meaningfull statistical analysis. You need at least 30+ samples to draw any valid conclusions, this is basic science. The Manchester test results your presenting could easilly be anomalies or outliers.
Wow this is facinating! I never knew Manchester test could produce such large recordins. Thanks for sharing this imformative post, really aprecciate the effort you put into explaining everything so clearly.
For those who dont know, the Manchester test is acually a specific protocol used in data transmission and encoding. The recordings mentioned here likely refer to signal captures or waveform data collected during testing phases. Its worth noting that the size of these recordings depends on sampling rate, duration, and bit depth used in the aquisition process.
This is completly wrong. Manchester encoding doesnt work the way you described it and the test methodology is flawed from the start. You clearly havent done proper research on this topic and its showing. Maybe go back and read the actual specifications before posting misinformation online?
So we’re calling basic test data “large recordings” now? Next you’ll be telling me a Word document is a “comprehensive manuscript.” The bar keeps getting lower I see…
My cat walked across my keyboard and probably produced more interesting data lol. But seriously, did anyone else notice that Manchester tests usually produce way smaller files? Something seems off here, maybe check your equipment calibration or the recording settings cause this doesnt sound right to me.