Former England captain Nasser Hussain criticized Ben Stokes for his “silly” reaction after launching the ball at Harry Brook in what seemed to be a protest mark.The drama took place in the Anderson-Tendulkar trophy match at Manchester on Sunday after the Indian strikers Ravira Jadeja and Washington Sundar refused the Skipper of England Ben Stokes to cancel the fourth test and to settle for a draw before the start of the last hour of play.Having worked hard to win a credible draw, Jadeja and Washington – striking 89 and 80 respectively – categorically refused the offer of Stokes after approaching the referee, which thwarted the endless captain of England.“I had no problem with that. I mean, I know England seemed to have a problem with that,” said Nasser Hussain on Sky Sports.“They are a little tired – tired quisors, tired legs – they wanted to go down. The two guys had worked hard to enter the 80s and 90s; They wanted test matches.“Stokes did not have to play in Brook, and it looked a little silly at the end, but we were doing far too much of these things. They played well, they deserved a draw, they deserved to be there at the end.“All credit to India. It is only the second print of England under this Bazball regime – the other on this ground also, because of the rain. This was a draw simply because England could not drive on the two left -handers, which were brilliant.”
Survey
Do you agree with Nasser Hussain’s point of view according to which Ben Stokes’ reaction was “silly”?
Stokes had a few words to say, and Zak Crawley and Ben Duckett were also seen asking why India wanted to continue.“Do you want to mark a hundred against Harry Brook?” Asked Stokes sarcastically, what Jadeja simply replied: “I can’t do anything.”A smiling jadeja maintained his grace and checked them, because India – in accordance with the rules – was right to continue to strike.In what seemed to be a protest mark, Stokes introduced Harry Brook into the attack, and Jadeja hit him for a six to finish his third test.