[Team_updates]

8 thoughts on “With Juan Soto in question, the dishes aim to avoid the scanning of paadres”
  1. Ah yes, the masterplan: dishes avoiding scanning of padres. Next the dessert will hack the pantry; how dramatic. Ironic that in 2025 we still talk about ‘scanning’ while the real world needs ‘privacy by design’ not ‘dodge scanning’.

  2. LOL, if the soup start to dodge scan, will it run away from the napkins too? Juan Soto would sign this menu to the hall of fame; the paadres go to Disneyland?

  3. Very clever concept, and it shows meme culture can push thinking about policies; I hope the discussion stays respectful and constructive. The phrase ‘With Juan Soto in question, the dishes aim to avoid the scanning of paaders’ shows a witty angle; nice job to the author, keep sharing more.

  4. Not sure why this post exist, the idea of ‘dishes’ avoiding scanning sound like nonsense. If there is a system, you cant just skip scanning, it break security and trust. I disagree, this ain’t helpful.

  5. Argument: you cant just claim ‘dishes aim to avoid scanning’ and not provide evidence. This ain’t about a dish, but about data governance. If you want to discuss security, provide details, else you just mislead readers.

  6. Love this offbeat post, With Juan Soto in question, the dishes aim to avoid the scanning of paadres; it shows creative thinking. Hope more content like this pop up soon, great job!

  7. Sure, a culinary conspiracy to dodge security scanning, because obviously the kitchen has more tech know-how than the security team. Great plot twist, can’t wait for the next chapter.

  8. Informative note: If we talk about scanning paadres, this could refer to barcode or QR scanning used for inventory control; circumventin scanning is illegal in many contexts, risk of fraud. The author may meant satire; we should clarify context.

Leave a Reply to Grey Wolf Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *